GHISLAINE MAXWELL PERVERT TRIAL (2022)
&
RELATED 'RANDY ANDY' CIVIL TRIAL see
after 29)
BY: rogercallow.com SUBHEADING (G.M. PERVERT TRIAL
Dec. 2021)
1) Have I ever been wrong? The wrong
question; rather, have I ever been right? ANS. Yup. I correctly predicted
the Cdn. election last July
with Postmedia which runs the news
across Canada apart from the Gov't controlled CBC, losing all credibility in the
process although they would never blame themselves for that deficiency rather
limiting the blame to 33% of the voters who voted Liberal.
2) So once again, in the
prediction department, how do I know that G.M. is going to walk? It is an O.J.
Simpson type of thingy. Find her not guilty on the criminal charge but charge
her on succeeding civil charges which will be handily bought off by Defense
lawyers (both female in this case for political advantage) wanting to share in
the spoils.
3) But it is a jury trial you
say. A jury is limited to the information presented in court which is where the
'fix' lies. If the pilot logs are not entered, there is no proof that GB was
ever on Perv Island as a 'madam for
under-aged girls fed to rich clients who exchanged insider stock information
for stock tips'. If those logs were presented, such figures as 'Randy Andy',
Bill Clinton, Donald Trump, and Bill Gates would have to be called to the stand
to attest to the existence of these flights... and that would never do.... So
both the prosecution and defense are in the same bag leaving the judge to keep
the jury on the 'straight and narrow'; namely, his own version of the 'straight
and narrow'.
4) In the public's mind, many
believed O.J. Simpson got away with murder (my earlier account differs). In
this case GM will appear to get away with grooming under-age prostitutes; a
distinctive 'no-no' in the public mind. Even if she is convicted; to be sure an
Appeal Trial will reject the outcome 'for technical reasons'. In brief, Perv Island will remain safe
for the 'rich and powerful'. The glitch? social media such as this blog. The
U.S. will be seen to go the way of the 'banana republic of Cda. Justice System.' The
Prosecution, the Defense and the Presiding judge can insist on these pilot
logs...but will they? I think not.
5) First so-called Prosecutorial
mistake: providing some pilot logs, presumably for the time
that the 4 under-age defendants travelled to perv Island with G.M. That establishes that the logs have
not been destroyed. However, 4 trips does NOT establish that GM was
systematically travelling to Perv Island with under-age girls. For that we need all
the pilot logs. In effect, the prosecution is flying a 'false flag' by claiming
the pertinent logs were filed. I suspect that an incomplete
list was also filed deleting any client names on board whose testimony would be
vital. The lawyers on both sides only make money if there is an ensuing civil
action similar to O.J. Simpson which won't happen if G.M. loses on the criminal
trial. My model for this claim? The 1985 Arbitration for my senior teacher
'layoff for economic reasons under the neophyte imposed BILL
35 (1985) which was later quashed by the court ruling, as it did, the
arbitrator to be patently unreasonable. I got the court
judgment after ditching the Union lawyer.
6) It sounds like damning
evidence from the pilot for Epstein since 1991 as to existence of travels
to Perv Island including 2
former U.S. Presidents - Bill Clinton & Donald Trump - plus 'Randy Andy'
and Bill Gates, but the Defense correctly questioned whether there was any
proof that women on plane were under-aged, plus the pilot never witnessed sex
on plane = salacious but hardly convincing proof that G.M. was pimping
under-age girls; the major charge against her as these partial logs have
limited relevance along with the pilot's testimony. All logs,
which the pilot turned over to Epstein, must be produced in order to make this
claim pass the litmus test of 'critical mass'. The Prosecution obviously has
these logs in their possession. As to 'clients'; their cover story is hedge
fund business on so-called Perv Island. It sounds very much as though the
Prosecution is eager to complete their case in short order as they have leaped
to one of the 'under-age' girls. The judge should call for all pilot logs to
see if they have been adulterated but I doubt he will. Surely someone on the
Jury must be smelling a rat by now.
7) The Jury is
in a difficult position if GM is exonerated as not only the public (O.J.
Simpson trial) will condemn them as will the Prosecution. Their position is, of
course, that the jury has to function on the case as presented in
court. If they detect that they are to be made patsies, the only
protection they have is sticking to the fact that they are a hung jury thus
forcing a re-trial... the public would get the message. If GM is freed, to be
sure there will be a public reaction much like the indigenous deaths
in Canada leading to church burnings; in this case, U.S. court bdlgs. would be a handy target and
while many law-abiding Americans would be horrified; they would stop short of
condemning those in active revolt.
8) The first under-age female
victim's testimony has veracity. The Defense was left thrashing about. G.M. may
not 'walk' after all unless Defense comes up with better explanations other
than just downloading all blame on the suicided Epstein. Of course G.M. could get a similar fate
before the case goes to the jury. Alternatively, a juror may hold out creating
a hung jury so that it has to happen all over again. This case is not like the
murder case of O.J. Simpson with a couple of dead bodies; rather it is on a
topic anathema to middle class America. Will the U.S. Justice System become the
world's biggest pimp? Further, it seems the mother was pimping her own daughter
to promote the latter's acting career. However, it is the age-level which
convicts G. M.
9) 'The smoking gun' theory: So
far, there is no evidence of sexual intercourse on either Perv Airlines or any other
locale. 'I did not have sex with that woman' POTUS Bill
Clinton re intern Monica Lewinski but she kept the skirt with his DNA semen on
it which made her case. What then? Nothing. Clinton and his enabler wife (who
almost became a U.S. President) continued to function in U.S. Society: e.g.
Along with G.H. Bush, he visited Haiti after its disastrous earthquake to raise
funds. Unless the Defense can produce an adult client who confesses to having
sex with one of the Defendants; the Defense has a 'he said, she said' scenario
as no other records or evidence appears to have been kept by the under-age
girls. Most Prosecutions would refuse to lay charges under these conditions.
But Lewinski was one 'of age' female in a single case; on trial here is a major
pimping ring which is failing to distinguish the role of GM in any significant
fashion apart from 'suicided' pervert Epstein whom she
blames for everything (in essence the trial is about collusion, not an easy
matter to proove). On the other hand, the U.S. public
will be outraged if GM 'walks'. However, the Defense has yet to mount their
case. Remember that in any murder trial, the body and weapon need not
necessarily be produced to get a conviction, the 'smoke' alone will do. Thus I
am still waiting for the 'rabbit in a hat' evidence. Further, for the
accusation of pimping, a slew of under-age girls were involved but they have
all gone on to families of their own and careers which they do not want
disturbed. It is a kind of Harvey Weinstein scenario.... damned if they do
confess but escape damnation if they refuse to confess. P.S. I
have the 'smoking gun' and the body in FAA (2019); what I
don't have is the Justice System in my back pocket. In the related issue, the
WV School Board trick in 1985 was to 'lay me off for declining enrolment' but
making the matter one of 'teacher competence' in the media. Both died under
this unresolved labour issue making 'democratic Cda.' redundant as no-one will
trust to a Cdn. Institution.
10) I am beginning to see why MB would
not prosecute Canada's 80 year old alleged pedophile leaving it to ON to lay
the charge in a case which would require extensive investigation at a high
financial cost. That extensive investigation is missing with the GB trial. All
we have are under-age girls returning to Pervland and accepting gifts under a very careful accounting
by GB. The rest is 'he said, she said'. No mention of drugs or specific sex
acts has been made which would be an integral part of the grooming process. For
these girls to make money, they need GB to be exonerated on criminal charges so
that they can make money on the ensuing civil cases; the lawyers of course
getting their cut. We will just have to wait for the Defense case as there is
really nothing on the Prosecution side which possibly was the intention. The
clients, of course, will deny everything, hence a housekeeper or attendant
would have key information...if the right questions are asked. So far, they
have seen nothing. I am opting for acquittal leaving the U.S. Justice System as
being #1 Pimp under these circumstances.
11) At this point the judge
should intervene and ask the Prosecution to address the following
questions: a) Will any evidence be provided, other than the
under-age victims testimony, to the fact that a sexual act occurred with any
under-age victim in which GB was in attendance or implicated in that particular
sexual act? b) If the answer to the proceeding is in the
affirmative; how will the Prosecution show that this one act was systematic in
order to justify the grooming aspect of GB being a pimp with other than the
victims in this trial? If I am not satisfied as to answers from the Prosecution
on this level, I will give serious consideration to dropping this case without
referring this matter to a jury Decision.
12) So now we have a fourth
under-age victim on drugs testifying to having sex with Epstein after numerous
visits. Her mother would not let her get a passport to go to Perv Island. Why not? It
would appear that the mother is implicit as this minor was well
paid although the drug dealers appear to have got most of it. To
which extent, in other words, can one trust a drug addict? (not much). Hence we
are still in 'he said, she said'. Where were the witnesses to the sexual
encounter other than GM? While I am not sympathetic to GM, this trial is going
the way of the O.J. Simpson criminal trial. There is co-ordinating evidence, but it is not
being presented.
13)
Banker's Boxes of
data wheeled into court are the key to GM's case and any other major case which
can take up to 2 yrs. of legal billable time to sort. Law Offices across the
land saw 'no boxes' here hence signifying the outcome. The judge should throw
this case out now in which he has options e.g. tabling case
14) Prosecution expected to wind
up on Fri. but illness forces postponement. As for the Defense? If
the judge does not throw this case out of court, the Defense should proceed
directly to concluding arguments in this travesty of Federal Justice which is a
blight on all America... move over Cdn. Justice System.... Then it is off to the more lucrative
civil actions.... more B.S.
15) So I have to read in the Br. Press
that the Prosecution in the GB Case has rested their case after 10 days
(no Cdn. media notice). If the
Afghan withdrawal is Strike 1 for POTUS Biden, and FAA is
strike 3, will the GB Federal Perv Trial be strike 2? As to future lucrative civil
action (O.J. Simpson model); try collecting from a freed GB in France where she
holds citizenship. lol As to the U.S. it
becomes the 'pimp capital' of the world. (GM not alone as female human
trafficking from Ukraine to U.S. is a major problem.)
16) The judge dropping the
evidence by two of the female accusers 'because they were of age' underscores
the pimping charge in a major way. I can see a hung jury on this one which
could very easily be the point as the trial would have to be done all over
again (forgotten as GB flies to France where she has citizenship or kept in the
U.S. where she is suicided). Unlike some European
countries, the USA does not have the damnable phrase, 'not proven' with
the perp being released. G.B. is
either 'guilty' (of at least one charge) or 'not guilty'. Sometimes courts
find perps guilty of a minor
misdemeanor in a major trial as a way of 'covering their ass'. 'Tabling' a
charge is another court stunt in which the court postpones a hearing until more
evidence becomes available (usually just forgotten) places the Jury in this
case in a hopeless position but I do not think that this has ever happened in
N. America (e.g. Vice Admiral Mark Norman non-trial Jury in which the judge
lied in conjunction with the Prosecution and Defense lawyer (I had that stunt
pulled in 1985 in West Vancouver in an Arbitration) to derail any future civil
claims. 'You are exonerated' said the judge to a very surprised
Mark Norman in court one morning when in fact he had not been (tabling is not
exoneration). Will the U.S. judge in the GB trial pull a 'Mark Norman' in some
sense or other. I suspect as much.
The
qualifications of this LGBTQ judge are frightening in the extreme as she
appears to be a political appointee.
17) This farce of a trial (he
said, she said) could very easily end up with a 'hung jury' releasing GB...
perhaps that was always the aim. Then it is over to 'Brandon' to put his stamp
of approval/disapproval on it. Of course the Defense end their case without GB
testifying. That is only done when the Defense believe that they have lost.
This sham of a trial is mercifully over.
18) In private instructions by
the judge to the two legal Counsel - the key to what the Bench wants; namely, a
minor misdemeanor on GB's part to justify G.B.'s incarceration to date - was
blown off by Defense correctly saying in effect that she can't 'suck and blow'
at the same time. The only hope for the Bench now is a hung Jury which is not a
far out proposition as they have very little in fact to go by. Redoing this trial
is not in the cards hence the rich clients escape censure. Next up after the
Decision of whatever kind? Why POTUS 'Brandon' of course.
19)
The set-up: While
waiting for the closing arguments in which the Defense give no sway (why should
they knowing that the purpose of the Prosecution was to 'throw the case' thus
protecting the male clients. No corroborating evidence as to sexual acts was
given). No self-respecting lawyer would serve on such a Counsel. Remember the
truth is not an external matter in a court of law; rather, it is what is
presented in court which constitutes the truth. The release of 200 death row
inmates in the 1990's due to the emerging DNA evidence is proof of Justice gone
significantly wrong in the U.S.
20) Lessons on the above point
from Canada in 1985 are pertinent with my senior teacher lay-off for economic
reasons in West Vancouver under the hastily created imposed BILL
35 (1985). The author, Deputy Education
Minister and former WV Principal, Jim Carter, himself the subject of scandal
with a senior teacher dismissal while he was Principal in 1958, illustrates how
a rogue civil servant can upend the institutions. (Ontario Deputy Minister of
Transport, Franco Alulio pulled a similar stunt which goes without challenge
today exposing the N. American driver's license to suspension without a reason
and, when coupled to Identity Theft where a victim no longer
has a legal existence, creating the crime of the 21st century.) The latter sin
was created under the glare of the internet but institutional ghosting,
including the media, keeps this story from surfacing. In 1985, the concept of
an internet did not exist to trouble the authorities.
21) In the 1985 Arbitration, the
arbitrator converted 16 new hires to read 17 lay-offs with myself being the
additional victim. I was the only lay-off. When I changed lawyers and went to
court, the Arbitration was quashed with gov't. appointed Arbitrator Louis Lindholm ruled 'patently
unreasonable. Justice Southin in 1986 repeatedly demanded that Stuart Clyne, Counsel for the WV School
Board to produce 'What was before the School Board when they chose to
lay-off senior teacher, Roger Callow? Clyne committed fraud by repeating the 16 plus 1 teacher
lay-off argument supported by the School Trustees at a meeting held in July of
1985; the same figures as the June figures. Those Trustees could also have been
charged. Then Southin j. goofed. Her Decision
was the famous 'should' return employment to this victim as opposed to 'must'
without making any reference to the lay-off figures as she hoped a nice buy-out
would result. Didn't happen. With the Decision in, Clyne & the WV Board were
in a position to blackmail her; a blackmail which extended over 35 years and
every province in Canada (with their own inequalities) heaping cover-up over
the cover-up so that no compensation was ever paid despite the fact that Southin ordered the matter back
to arbitration before the same arbitrator. The WV Board did not
go back to arbitration. In Dec. 2020, I ended my participation as the Justice
System imploded over this case. Currently, The Ottawa Court is so bad under
the FAA commencing in 2019 as an extension of this case in
Ontario, that I have called for a trusteeship to be imposed over it. I give
this detailed story here as I detect similar elements in the GM trial
which is turning out to be a whitewash job benefitting the rich clients of
Epstein. ...been there, done that....
22) When it was not possible
for GM to slip quietly back to France where she holds
citizenship and where, with the publicity, was in a position not unlike that of
Prince Andrew, a back room decision was made to arrest her in the U.S. and
'throw the case against her' thus using the U.S. Federal criminal court system
against itself = Canada, move over, the top 1% wealthy win again....
23) A worried judge giving
partisan instructions to jury hinting at a conviction is interesting as it
could merely push toward a hung jury; perhaps that is what the judge wants.
Such bench comments should have been from the Prosecution from which she could
have requested clarification during the trial. Maybe she did but I am going by
published material which could easily be inaccurate. I never had a jury trial in
my civil actions only judicial promises to deal with my salient questions
'later' which meant they were promptly forgotten as soon as the judge left the
bench. The GM judge should have demanded that the Prosecution - on pain of
having the case thrown out - provide corroborating evidence as to specific sex
acts and GM's role thereto which seemed to be lacking. Damning GM with a loose
definition of 'associating' with a pimp was 'a bridge too far' in my reaction
to published news on this case. In non legal terms, is she guilty? Guilty as
hell which should split the jury in this federal criminal trial. Oh, to be a
fly on the wall of that jury room....
24) This trial was to have opened
in Aug. then Oct. and now Dec. with the jury delaying their vote for 15
days until after the holiday = something smells. Now this jury is
exposed to outside influences... go figure....
25) Citing COVID pressures, the
Jury is now meeting daily and requesting more court materials. I can tell them
what they already know... key factual material is conspicuous by its absence
but are they looking for something equivalent to 'hang-nail' to convict GM of
something hoping that the public will believe justice has been done. The
Defense smells something as it does not want these deliberations to be rushed.
...oh to be that fly on the Deliberation room wall.... It is still a 'he
said/she said' trial.
26) With the conviction of GB by
a jury, 'he said/she said' (or in this case: 'she said/she didn't say') won out
with middle America cheering and me with egg on my face for suggesting the
Prosecution launched a weak case; particularly as the flight log was concealed.
Figures such as client Bill Clinton, Bill Gates, Donald Trump and others are,
by reflection, condemned and could expect civil suits such as the one already
against Prince Andrew. Of course an Appeal could see a reversal of this
Decision & may still be part of the plot providing GB doesn't get 'suicided'. Canada has its own
'Epstein' with 80 yr. old Peter Nygard imprisoned in ON. The top 1% wealthy clients must be
very nervous these days. Perhaps if I had had a jury with my many court
appearances over 35 years across Canada, I would have won as my charges were
documented with over 50 judges merely concluding that I was being 'frivolous
& vexatious' in a civil trial (jury structure different from
criminal trial) in my bid to obtain my rightful compensation as a teacher
illicitly laid-off from the former Employer, the West Vancouver School Board.
It was this failure which sank Justice Canada as employment law is central to
the Justice System. SEE rogercallow.com MEDIA
Nov./Dec. The GB outcome does not support the notion that any attempt
was made to influence jury deliberations. POTUS Biden has
apparently ducked a major blow over this trial so that he is left with Strike 1
being 'Kabul extraction' and Strike 3 'silence over the Franco Alulio Algorithm with its extension of Identity
Theft', an existential threat to the N. American driving public. I could
die in my sleep and yet this legal matter remains extant as an algorithm which
will never go away until ON Deputy Transport Minister Franco Alulio is charged with
treason/fraud.
27)
ACT II coming
up with an Appeal by GM which will focus on the judge's actions. I have been
through many many Appeal Courts in Canada
and found them all to be highly compromised. This case ain't over yet, but we could
get other actions against clients in the interim. Legally, there is much to
play around with. Age 17 is under-age in the U.S. but is the legal age for
prostitution in Br., but here's the point; the applicable laws must be the same
for both countries. While GM is accused of pimping, she was actually 'grooming'
which is not a law. The 20th Century '12 Angry Men' in which the truth is
according to what is presented in court has been supplanted by '12 Outraged
People' who in effect said, we are not going to be the public fall guys in this
one seen to be confirming under-age prostitution which I submit was to be the
case in this conspiracy if they did not free her due to lack of evidence. The
key is those airline logs and the failure of the judge to insist that they be
presented.
28) Confusion abounds - I am sure
with the courts as well (Mon. Jan. 03-2022) - trying to sort Prince Andrew and
his prime accuser of civil vs criminal activity.
29) So a U.S. judge wants Randy
Andy to stand trial criminally in the U.S. It is the photo with GM in the
background which convicts him for without her, there is no connection with the grooming
charge (which in itself is not a law). To be sure, GM has a photo gallery of
her with clients and underage girls which has some 1% wealthy males shaking in
their boots & GM dangerously close to assassination. Next up, why Canada's
very own 80 year old 'Epstein' (Peter Nygard) sitting in a Toronto jail. And this does not even count
the multitude of prostitutes run in both countries by Organized Crime. GM just
appears to be a freelancer albeit a classy one.
RANDY ANDY
(RA) 'CIVIL ACTION' FEB.2022
1) As noted in 29), one judge
wants RA to be charged criminally
(requires deportation) which is significantly different from a civil action launched by RA in the U.S.
before a judge without jury (where he
does not have to attend). The terms of
proof in a civil trial are less onerous for the Crown but what does the Crown
really have without GM taking the
stand which is to sign her death warrant as other wealthy participants e.g. former
President Bill Clinton, are exposed... in short, suicided
Epstein move over.... That was the job of GM; to remove incriminating evidence.
As to the damning photo of RA with the defendant and GM as far as the public is
concerned, the surrounding circumstances are all important as to how this photo was obtained. For example, in the 1990's, I
had an action against a Company which was widely known through faxed
information by me. Merely getting a copy of said info. was insufficient; the
Company had to have a copy direct from my fax number to one that they set up
for the purpose hoping to inveigle me into complying. It didn't work and their
case folded settling out of court on my terms.
2) The point of a civil case is all about money and why litigants are encouraged
to settle out of court (after the lawyers make their money in getting a cut of
the settlement where the big money lies.) That way the defendant retains
confidentiality which is not the case here as RA has been pilloried not only by
the public but by Queen Mum before any trial has been held. Tabloid headlines
are particularly reprehensible in that regard.
3) Readers of the above GM account above would believe that a weak case
from the Prosecution plus weak judging should have been sufficient for GM 'to
walk'. But the 'Hell no, jury', which was not going to be the 'fall guy' in
this pimp trial aborted the '12 Angry Men' approach and convicted GM.
4) Wishing to avoid the fate of GM, RA is launching a civil trial in the
U.S. without jury leaving the presiding judge with a predicament in this highly
political trial. Will he or she follow the 1946 Nuremberg Nazi trials
considered as 'phony as a $3 bill' as all those Nazi bastards were hanged, a
foregone conclusion? Or will the judge rely on unsupported evidence as a means
of justifying one of the World's top 1% wealthy family 'not guilty verdict'
forcing the complainant to pay onerous legal settlement fees which will not go
down well with the public. RA can cover his fees, the defendant cannot unless
crowd sourced which, again, leaves a dirty taste in the public mind. If ever
there was a lose-lose proposition, this is it.